Search Results for "power exchange"

1957 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1957 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults and Outraging Modesty Found Vague and Contradictory, Not Attracting Bar Under Section 18 of SC/ST Act.

The present appeal was filed by Suryakant Vitthalrao Shelke and Pradip Ramrao Surwase against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting their applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Claim Dispute. Claim for demurrage and detention charges held time-barred under Article 55 of Limitation Act, 1963 as the cause of action arose on completion of discharge, not on subsequent demand.

The Petitioner, National Iranian Tanker Company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a majorit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Commercial Dispute — Appointment of Arbitrator Directed. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles petitioner to seek appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Carol Info Services Ltd., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Section 9 Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration — Implied Party Finding Set Aside. Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to pre-BALCO agreements, but non-signatory cannot be treated as implied party without express consent.

The petitioners, GL Asia Mauritius II Cayman Limited and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21/08/2010 passed by the District Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Representation Not Considered Before Confirmation. Failure to Consider Representation Before Confirmation Under Section 8(f) of COFEPOSA Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2.4.2004 passed under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...