Search Results for "possession delay"

3819 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3819 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declares Land Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed for Non-Passage of Award Under BDA Act. Petitioner's Suit for Injunction Decreed in 2010, Acquisition Deemed Lapsed Due to Failure to Pass Award Within Reasonable Time.

The petitioner, M.P. Gundappa, owned 2 acres of land in Sy.No.124/2 at Nagadevanahalli, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk. The land was notified fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition in 1960s Case — Section 6 Declaration Issued Within One Year of Section 4 Notification, No Lapse Occurred.

The petitioners, owners of lands in Borla and Deonar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Second Appeals Challenging Common Judgment Declaring Sale Deed Null and Void and Granting Possession. The Appeals Arise from Disputes Over Validity of Registered Sale Deed, Limitation for Declaration, and Non-Consideration of Additional Evidence Application.

Two second appeals were filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the common judgment and decree of the VII Additional Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Procedure Code Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review Petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC fails as petitioner seeks re-argument on merits, not review of error.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav, delivered a CAV order on 16.12.2025 in Review Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Confirmation of Share Transfer in Wound-Up Company Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Evidence. Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 requires timely application and proof of bona fide transfer before winding up order.

The appellant, Rathnam P.V., filed an appeal against the order of the Company Judge dismissing his application under Section 536(2) of the Companies A...