Search Results for "minimum demand"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "minimum demand"

1185 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1185 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention of Goods under IGST: State Commercial Tax Officer Held to Have Jurisdiction Under Section 4 of IGST Despite No Separate Notification. Cross-Empowerment Under Section 4 of IGST Is Default Rule; No Separate Notification Required for State Officers' Jurisdiction Under IGST.

5 Mar 2025

The Karnataka High Court considered a writ petition filed by a proprietorship concern challenging orders of extension of physical verification, confis...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction in GST Confiscation Case. Commercial Tax Officer Holds Proper Officer Status Under IGST Act Due to Cross Empowerment; Notification Only Required for Exceptions.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern engaged in trading arecanut, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Makes Rule Returnable in Writs Seeking Compliance with RBI Master Circular on Loan Restructuring. Petitioners Allege Inability to Comply with Loan Obligations Due to Telecom Industry Downturn, Seek Direction to Banks Under Paragraph 6.4 of RBI Master Circular Dated 1 July 2015.

3 Feb 2020

The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1893 of 2019, GTL Infrastructure Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

14 May 2024

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prior Approval Under MCOC Act Against Mother of Accused for Lack of Continuing Unlawful Activity — Pre-Arrest Bail Granted Despite Section 21(3) Embargo. The court held that a single act of purchasing a car after the crime does not constitute 'continuing unlawful activity' under Section 2(1)(d) of MCOC Act, and Section 21(3) does not bar constitutional remedy under Article 226.

28 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a woman, challenged the prior approval granted under Section 23(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs MHADA to Pay Compensation for Land Acquired 36 Years Ago Without Award — Violation of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution. Non-payment of compensation for compulsory acquisition under Section 93(5) of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, held arbitrary and unconstitutional; court orders payment with interest at 9% per annum from date of possession.

1 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Yusuf Yunus Kantharia, was the owner of a plot of land measuring 979 sq. metres in Dharavi, Mumbai, along with a chawl known as Kantha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

12 Aug 2024

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Demat Accounts of Promoter for Non-Compliant Company Under SEBI Circulars — Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Freezing of all securities held by a promoter in a non-compliant company, including unrelated investments, without notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal under Article 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

26 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by Dr. Pradeep Mehta and his son Neil Pradeep Mehta challenging the freezing of their demat acc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Government Corrigendum Allowing Multiple Cooperative Societies in One Revenue Village. The Court upheld the State Government's authority to amend its policy to permit more than one Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society (PACCS) in a revenue village, finding the corrigendum valid and in the interest of cooperative development.

30 Aug 2024

The judgment concerns three writ petitions challenging a Government Corrigendum dated 14th February 2017 issued by the Ministry of Cooperation, Market...

93 94 95 96 97

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)