Search Results for "disciplinary punishment"

1231 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1231 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of School Management Against Reinstatement of Teacher Accused of Sexual Misconduct with Students. Departmental Inquiry Not Dependent on Criminal Trial Outcome.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Secretary, Lucy Sequeira Trust and another, the management of a school, against the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Back Wages to Reinstated Employee. Denial of back wages from dismissal to reinstatement amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment and order dated 14.3.2016 of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which part...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition and Allows Trust's Petition in Service Law Dispute Under MEPS Act. Appointment Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of the MEPS Act is Void, and Termination of Such Employee Does Not Require Compliance with Section 7.

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from a dispute between an employee, Shatrughan Dada Kamble, and the Academy of Fine Arts & Craf...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition and Allows Employee's Petition in Service Dispute Over Dismissal on Unproven Charges. Employer Cannot Use Loss of Confidence to Bypass Disciplinary Proceedings When Charges of Misconduct Are Not Proved.

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from an Industrial Court order dated 12 July 2005. The employer, Agricultural Produce Market Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement of Daily Wager Denied Due to Lack of Continuous Service. Employee failed to prove 240 days of continuous service in preceding year, disentitling him to protection under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the appellant) challenging the judgment of a learne...