Search Results for "bail order"

5080 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5080 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Bank Fraud Case Due to Cooperation and No Custodial Interrogation Required. Petitioners Allegedly Induced Bank to Sanction Loans Based on Forged Documents, but Court Found No Need for Custody as Documents Already Seized and Petitioners Cooperated.

The petitioners, Rudhir Sareen, Saurav Vinay Jain, and Kamlesh Hari Kochra, filed separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Vinod s/o Savalaram Kanadkhedkar, was a junior clerk in the Tahsil office, Nanded. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nanded in Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Communication of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Documents Relied Upon Were Not Supplied.

The petitioner, Shabbirbhai Bookwala, father of the detenu Mustafa Sabbirbhai Bookwala, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Delay in FIR. The court held that the relationship appeared consensual and the delay in filing FIR raised doubts, entitling the accused to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, Narasappa, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in C.C. No. 1362/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Grounds Were Served in English, Not in Kannada Which Detenu Understood.

The petitioner, Smt. Shylamma, mother of the detenu Abhishek @ Abhi @ Sutta, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Rehears Quashing Petition Against Lokayukta FIR for Disproportionate Assets After Supreme Court Remand; Petitioner Alleges Absence of Preliminary Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind by Superintendent of Police Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, a Superintendent Engineer in the Public Works Department, Government of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010168012022_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Retraction of Statement and Delay of Over 11 Months in Passing Order Vitiate Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1)(i) of COFEPOSA Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Gaurav Kanak Jain, challenged a detention order dated 21st November 2016 passed under Section 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign E...