Search Results for "arbitrary sanction"

1278 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1278 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against High Court's Mandamus to Consider OTS Application. Court Holds That No Writ of Mandamus Can Be Issued to Direct a Bank to Grant One Time Settlement Benefit Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which, in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty on Educational Institution for Excess Admissions in AICTE Case. Institution directed to pay balance penalty of Rs. 19.10 crore; students awarded degrees despite illegal admissions.

The petitioner, Foundation for Organizational Research and Education Fore School of Management, a registered educational institution, applied to AICTE...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal to Rescind Tax Rebate Notification Under Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 — State's Power to Withdraw Rebate Upheld Despite Existing Industrial Units' Compliance.

The case involves two civil appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against M/s. Birla Corporation Limited concerning the validity of a notificati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Termination of Lease and Eviction Orders in MIDC Land Dispute. Lease Termination Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Comply with Conditions and Was Not Entitled to Protection Under Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955.

The petitioner, M/s. Sesa Sterlite Ltd., a Public Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...