Search Results for "Joint Registrar order"

1926 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1926 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Appeal Against Rejection of Public Trust Registration. The Court Examines Whether 'Shri Sheriche Mahadev Mandir' Qualifies as a Public Trust Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, Based on Admissions, Management History, and Will Deed.

The case arose from an attempt to register 'Shri Sheriche Mahadev Mandir' in Jalna as a public trust under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Court's Injunction Against Bank's Recovery Notice Despite SARFAESI Proceedings — Jurisdiction of Cooperative Court Not Ousted by SARFAESI Act for Disputes Under Section 91 of MCS Act.

The petitioner, M/s. Shewalkar Developers Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in land development and construction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Housing Society Challenging Orders Under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Society's refusal to admit purchaser as member and issue NOC for plot transfer was set aside as applicant fulfilled all eligibility criteria.

The petitioner, The Ichalkaranji Ex-serviceman Housing Society Limited, challenged an order dated 11.02.2025 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Lecturer in Service Dispute — Continuous Service and Permanent Status Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. The Court modified back-wages to be limited to the date of the Tribunal's order, not beyond.

The petitioners, Deccan Education Society and the Principals of Willingdon College and Chintamanrao College of Commerce, Sangli, challenged an order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...