Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

2559 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2559 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Compensation Under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Court upholds Competent Authority's award of compensation for right of user over land for pipeline, finding no error in market value determination or procedural compliance.

The petitioner, Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the compensation awarded b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Sanction in Corruption Case Against Motor Vehicles Inspector. Sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 held valid as sanctioning authority applied its mind to the material.

The petitioner, Dr. H. C. Sathyan, a Motor Vehicles Inspector working at the RTO Office, Sakleshpur, was charge-sheeted by the Karnataka Lokayukta Pol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — State's Revision Petition Allowed. Trial Court's Fine of Rs.10,000 Increased to Rs.50,000 for Offence Under Section 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The State of Karnataka, through the Drug Inspector, Hassan Circle, filed a Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Injunction Order in Pledge Dispute, Upholds Ad-Interim Relief Despite Delay in Pronouncement. Delay of Over One Year in Passing Interlocutory Order Does Not Automatically Vitiate It Unless Prejudice Is Demonstrated.

The case involves three commercial appeals filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 5 June 2023 pass...