WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013
1 Oct 2014The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...
Search Results for "prior representation"
3300 result(s) found
Found 3300 result(s)
High Court
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Quashing Petitions by Ex-Employees in Data Theft Case; Court Reserves Judgment on Whether Confidential Information Constitutes Property Under IPC and IT Act. The case involved allegations of theft of confidential data by former employees, raising significant questions on the intersection of information technology law and traditional property concepts under criminal law.
29 Apr 2025The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard two criminal petitions filed by former employees of M/s Silicomp India Private Limited (accused Nos. 2,...
- 31
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Editor in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Magistrate Permission for Investigation. The Court held that Section 155(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies to non-cognizable offences under Section 23 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and investigation without Magistrate permission is vitiated, barring cognizance.
21 Mar 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...
- 348
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Council of Architecture's Authority Over AICTE in Architectural Education Matters — Conflict Between Two Regulatory Bodies Resolved in Favor of Special Statute. The Court held that the Architects Act, 1972, being a special statute, prevails over the general AICTE Act, 1987, in matters of approval and regulation of architectural institutions.
8 Nov 2019The case involves a conflict between two regulatory bodies: the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and the Council of Architecture (CoA...
- 212
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Issuance of Project Affected Person Certificate to Senior Citizen. Petitioner's land acquired for irrigation project in 1970s; court directs respondent to decide representation within 8 weeks.
23 Jun 2022The petitioner, Subhash S/o Eknath Nafade, a 73-year-old senior citizen, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking a wr...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer Order in OBC Corporation Case — Transfer Found Malafide and in Violation of Service Rules. Transfer of District Manager to Raigad set aside as it was made without notice, without considering pending representation, and with oblique motive to accommodate another employee.
7 Mar 2013The petitioner, Kishor Shridharrao Mhaske, was employed as a District Manager with the Maharashtra OBC Finance & Development Corporation, a government...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
21 Jan 2014The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Inclusion of Voters in Cooperative Society Election, Upholds Bar Under Rule 78 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules, 2014. Remedy of Election Petition Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Held to Be Exclusive and Bar Writ Jurisdiction.
15 Jun 2015The petitioners, members of Shivanand Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.
30 Nov -0001The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...
- 179
