Search Results for "potential value"

1064 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1064 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Reduced Based on Government Ready Reckoner. Market Value Determined at Rs.154 per sq. meter Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as Claimant Failed to Produce Sale Instances.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and decree dated 18 November 2000 passed by the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony found doubtful and medical evidence contradicted prosecution timeline.

The case pertains to the murder of Dashrath Charmya Kale, allegedly committed by the appellants, Bhurya @ Gulab s/o Fajitya Kale and his wife Suman, o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Rate Fixed at Rs. 150 per sq.metre Instead of Rs. 263.20 per sq.metre. Reference Court's enhancement set aside due to lack of comparable sale instances and failure to consider the land's paddy field character.

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Government of Goa acquired 1635 square metres of land belonging to the respondent, Smt. Victori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Extortion and Assault Case — No Prima Facie Case of Extortion Made Out as Demand Was for Genuine Dues. Applicant Accused Under Sections 384, 385, 323, 504, 506, 109, 114, 34 IPC Granted Bail as Allegations of Extortion Not Made Out.

The applicant, Santosh s/o Chabiladas Chaudahri, filed an application for regular bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. He was named as acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...