High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Rate Fixed at Rs. 150 per sq.metre Instead of Rs. 263.20 per sq.metre. Reference Court's enhancement set aside due to lack of comparable sale instances and failure to consider the land's paddy field character.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 161
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Government of Goa acquired 1635 square metres of land belonging to the respondent, Smt. Victoria Fernandes, from survey no.573/1 in village Calapur for the construction of a playground at Santa Cruz (Calapur). The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued on 22/3/1993 and published in the Official Gazette on 6/5/1993. The Land Acquisition Officer made an award on 10/10/1996 fixing the market rate at Rs.30 per sq.metre. Dissatisfied, the respondent sought a reference under Section 18, claiming Rs.300 per sq.metre. In Land Acquisition Case No.44/1999, the Additional District Judge, North Goa at Panaji, partly allowed the reference and enhanced the compensation to Rs.263.20 per sq.metre, relying on sale deeds dated 6/12/1989 (Exhibit 19) for Rs.300 per sq.metre and 12/10/1990 (Exhibit 20) for Rs.367.50 per sq.metre, as well as an earlier award in Land Acquisition Case No.57/86 fixing Rs.150 per sq.metre for a 1984 notification. The appellants, the Deputy Collector (LA) and the Directorate of Sports and Youth Affairs, appealed against this enhancement. The High Court of Bombay at Goa examined the evidence and found that the Reference Court had erred. The acquired land was a paddy field below road level by 60-70 cms, located about 1.5 kms from Panaji town limits, with amenities like Santa Cruz market at 400 metres and a road at 55 metres. The sale deeds relied upon were for small plots (300 sq.metres and 417 sq.metres) sold 3-4 years before the notification, and the earlier award was for a different notification year. The High Court held that the Reference Court failed to apply proper deductions for development and size, and that the market value should be determined based on the potential of the land as on the date of notification. The High Court set aside the Reference Court's award and reduced the market rate to Rs.150 per sq.metre, considering the earlier award as a reasonable guide, and directed that the respondent be entitled to statutory benefits under the Act.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation - Market Value Determination - Comparable Sales Method - The court must consider sale deeds of comparable lands in the vicinity near the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In this case, the sale deeds relied upon by the respondent were of small plots sold in 1989 and 1990, whereas the notification was in 1993, and the acquired land was a large paddy field requiring development. Held that the Reference Court erred in relying on those sale deeds without making proper deductions for development and size. (Paras 5-8)

B) Land Acquisition - Compensation - Potential Value - The potential value of land for building purposes can be considered, but when the land is a paddy field and not yet ripe for development, a deduction for development charges is necessary. The court must assess the market value as on the date of notification under Section 4. Held that the Reference Court failed to apply the correct principles for determining market value. (Paras 6-8)

C) Land Acquisition - Compensation - Previous Award as Guideline - An earlier award in Land Acquisition Case No.57/86 fixing market rate at Rs.150 per sq.metre for a notification in 1984 can be a relevant guide, but escalation must be justified. In this case, the High Court found that the Reference Court's enhancement to Rs.263.20 per sq.metre was excessive and reduced it to Rs.150 per sq.metre, considering the nature of the land and lack of comparable evidence. (Paras 7-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Reference Court was justified in enhancing the compensation for the acquired land from Rs. 30 per sq.metre to Rs. 263.20 per sq.metre, and what is the correct market value of the acquired land as on the date of Section 4 notification.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment and award dated 28/02/2003 passed by the Additional District Judge, North Goa at Panaji in Land Acquisition Case No.44/1999, and fixed the market rate of the acquired land at Rs.150 per sq.metre. The respondent is entitled to statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Law Points

  • Land Acquisition
  • Compensation
  • Market Value
  • Comparable Sales
  • Deduction for Development
  • Potential Value
  • Section 4 Notification
  • Section 18 Reference
  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (10) 134

First Appeal No.202 of 2003

2010-10-07

A. P. Lavande

Shri S. Vadhidulla, Additional Government Advocate for the Appellants; Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the Respondent

Deputy Collector (LA) and Land Acquisition Officer, Panaji; Directorate of Sports and Youth Affairs, Panaji, Goa

Smt. Victoria Fernandes

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against enhancement of compensation in land acquisition reference

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of the Reference Court's award enhancing compensation from Rs.30 per sq.metre to Rs.263.20 per sq.metre

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged the Reference Court's determination of market value as excessive and not based on proper evidence

Previous Decisions

Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.30 per sq.metre on 10/10/1996; Reference Court enhanced to Rs.263.20 per sq.metre on 28/02/2003 in Land Acquisition Case No.44/1999

Issues

Whether the Reference Court correctly determined the market value of the acquired land at Rs.263.20 per sq.metre? What is the appropriate market value of the acquired land as on the date of Section 4 notification?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Reference Court erred in relying on sale deeds of small plots sold 3-4 years before the notification without making deductions for development and size, and that the land was a paddy field with limited potential. Respondent argued that the sale deeds were of comparable lands in the vicinity and the earlier award in Land Acquisition Case No.57/86 supported the enhancement.

Ratio Decidendi

In determining market value for land acquisition, the court must consider comparable sale instances of similar lands near the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. When the acquired land is a large paddy field requiring development, deductions for development charges and size must be applied. The potential value for building purposes can be considered but must be assessed as on the date of notification. The Reference Court's reliance on sale deeds of small plots without proper deductions and on an earlier award for a different notification year was erroneous. The market value of Rs.150 per sq.metre, based on an earlier award for a nearby land with escalation, is reasonable.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal the appellants take exception to judgment and award dated 28/02/2003 passed by the Additional District Judge, North Goa at Panaji in Land Acquisition Case No.44/1999 partly allowing the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act,1894. The Reference Court held that the acquired land was in the outskirts of Panaji town and the distance of the acquired land and the limits of Panaji town was about 1.5 kms. Admittedly, the acquired land was a paddy field and was below the road level by about 60-70 cms.

Procedural History

The Land Acquisition Officer made an award on 10/10/1996 fixing compensation at Rs.30 per sq.metre. The respondent filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which was registered as Land Acquisition Case No.44/1999. The Additional District Judge, North Goa at Panaji, partly allowed the reference on 28/02/2003, enhancing compensation to Rs.263.20 per sq.metre. The appellants filed First Appeal No.202 of 2003 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, which was reserved on 29/09/2010 and decided on 7/10/2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4, Section 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Order Voiding Assembly Election in Nuh Constituency for Corrupt Practices. Appeal to Religion and False Statements Under Sections 123(3) and 123(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 Led to Setting Aside ...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Grandfather's Appeal to Cancel Gift Deed Under Senior Citizens Act — Gift Deed Without Condition to Provide Basic Amenities Cannot Be Cancelled Under Section 23(1) of Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Sen...