Search Results for "misconceived"

2580 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2580 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Lack of Notice Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Co-owners Not Served Individual Notice Before Acquisition for Irrigation Project, Violating Section 4(1) and Section 9(3) of the 1894 Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by three co-owners of agricultural land in Village Nere, Taluka Maval, District Pune, challenging the acquisit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Award Denying Subsistence Allowance for Failure to Mark Attendance During Suspension. Suspended Employee Not Required to Attend Factory Daily for Subsistence Allowance Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Level Employees Union, challenged an Award dated 13.08.2014 which rejected a Reference concerning denial of subsistence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).

The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch. 3/4th Majority for Removal of Upa-Sarpanch Must Be Calculated Based on Total Members of Panchayat, Not Only Those Present and Voting.

The petitioner, Archna Phulare, was the Upa-Sarpanch of Shivgaon-Pathari Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was passed against her by 7 votes to 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch. 3/4th Majority for Removal of Upa-Sarpanch Must Be Calculated Based on Total Members of Panchayat, Not Only Those Present and Voting.

The petitioner, Archna Phulare, was the Upa-Sarpanch of Shivgaon-Pathari Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was passed against her by 7 votes to 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Auction Allotment by CIDCO. Held that cancellation without prior notice and opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice and that the highest bidder acquires a vested right upon acceptance of bid.

The petitioner, Raviprakash Chaturdeo Patel, participated in an auction scheme (Scheme No.MM/SCH-18A/2021-22) conducted by the City and Industrial Dev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Age Relaxation Denial for EWS Candidates in Judicial Recruitment. EWS Category Not Entitled to Age Relaxation Under Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 as Relaxation Only for Backward Classes.

The petitioners, four individuals belonging to the Economically Weaker Section (EWS), challenged a communication dated 31st January 2022 from the Bomb...