Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

2507 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2507 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Education Officer's Order to Enforce Rule 45 of Secondary Schools Code for Daily Reading of Preamble in Schools. Court Dismisses Challenge by School Management, Directs Strict Compliance with Preamble Reading and Display.

29 Oct 2013

The judgment concerns two connected writ petitions. The first petition (Writ Petition No.1959 of 2013) was filed by Sanjay Ananda Salve, an Assistant ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Complaint Filed During Pendency of Domestic Enquiry Held Premature. Filing a complaint before completion of enquiry restricts management's right to proceed in accordance with law under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

29 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Bapu Parwati Urmude, was employed with the respondent, Premier Industries, from 1981. On 21st October 2002, the respondent alleged tha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Despite Objections to Earlier Appointee. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution and Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Empowers Court to Appoint Arbitrator When Parties Fail to Agree.

20 Dec 2013

The applicants, partners of a dissolved partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Interest Demand on Bonded Goods Under Customs Act. Interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 is Mandatory and Not Waivable Even for Delays Caused by Customs Authorities.

3 Apr 2006

The petitioners, M/s SBEC Sugar Limited and its shareholder S.S. Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Notification Appointing Delegates to Parsi Matrimonial Court for Non-Compliance with Section 25 of Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. State Government's power under Sections 24 and 25 to appoint delegates is subject to mandatory requirement of consulting the Parsi community and following election procedure.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Mrs. Delferooz Darius Dorabjee, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a Government notification dated 10.2.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision Against Setting Aside of Exparte Decree in Rent Control Case. Tenant's Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Allowed Due to Improper Service of Summons.

24 Mar 2006

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the landlord, Shailesh Sudhir Joglekar, against the judgment and order dated 26th February 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Statutory notice requirement under Section 434(1)(a) held mandatory and cannot be waived by agreement between parties.

7 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Dolphin Investment Pvt. Ltd., filed two company petitions under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Penalty Under Section 69A of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 for Non-Intimation of Alterations. The court upheld the validity of the Maharashtra Amendment Act 29 of 1984 imposing retrospective penalty for failure to intimate changes in partnership deeds.

26 Sep 2006

The petitioners, M/s. Adamji Lookmanji & Co. and others, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 25th April, 2005 and 12th October, 2004 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Civil Suit — Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory. Petitioner/Defendant Granted Relief as No Dilatory Tactics Were Adopted and Sufficient Cause Was Shown for Delay.

20 Oct 2006

The petitioner/defendant challenged the judgment and order dated 30th June 2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Margao, which decl...

92 93 94 95 96

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)