Search Results for "binding over"

5269 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5269 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against CIDCO's Refusal to Grant NOC for Additional FSI for IT/ITES Development. Government Order dated 31st August 2009 enabling additional FSI for IT/ITES use is binding on CIDCO as a planning authority.

The petitioner, M/s. Shakti Commercial Premises Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Coop. Societies Act, 1960, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Moratorium on Urban Co-operative Bank. RBI Directions Under Section 35A of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 Are Binding and Not Subject to Challenge Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The case involves three writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the directions issued by the Reserve Bank of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Megha Lok Adalat Decree in Property Suit — Petitioner Not a Party to Compromise. Decree Passed Without Jurisdiction as Dispute Was Not Referable to Lok Adalat Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, Kishore Baldev Bajaj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a decree dated 25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines to Address Delay in Pronouncement of Reserved Judgments by High Courts — Right to Speedy Justice Under Article 21. The Court held that inordinate delay in delivery of reserved judgments violates Article 21 and issued binding guidelines for timely pronouncement.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu exercise expanding the scope of individual writ petitions seeking pronouncement of reserved judgments, addre...