Search Results for "Article 173"

1059 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1059 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Discharge of Appellant in Custodial Death Case Due to Lack of Prosecution Materials Under Section 227 CrPC. Court Held That at the Stage of Framing of Charge, Only Prosecution Documents Can Be Considered and No Incriminating Material Existed Against the Appellant.

The appellant, owner of Goodwill Enterprises, had lodged an FIR (Crime No.351/1993) alleging robbery of business proceeds from his cashier Ram Kishore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Second FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Abuse of Process and Imposes Costs of Rs. 5 Lakhs. Second FIR on Same Allegations Filed After Acquittal in First FIR Constitutes Harassment and Misuse of Official Position.

The appeal arose from a matrimonial dispute between the appellant, Parteek Bansal, and respondent No. 3, a Deputy Superintendent of Police, who marrie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Return of Plaint in Summary Suit, Holds Dispute Not Commercial Under Commercial Courts Act. Assignment of Debt by Leasing Company Not an Ordinary Transaction of Financier or Trader Under Section 2(1)(c)(i) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Defendant No. 1 (Varanium Cloud Limited) seeking return of the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Arms Act Case Due to Lack of Essential Ingredient in DAD Notification. Possession of Buttondar Knife Not an Offence Unless for Manufacture, Sale or Test Under Delhi Administration Notification.

The appellant, Irfan Khan, was charged under Sections 25, 54, and 59 of the Arms Act, 1959, based on FIR No. 477/2022 registered at Police Station Gov...