Search Results for "time barred"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "time barred"

5500 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5500 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. The court held that the appellants failed to prove title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under the Portuguese Civil Code.

25 Jun 2010

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants, who were defendants in a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession filed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

9 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Three-Month Limitation Period Plus 30-Day Condonation Window Without Sufficient Cause.

2 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Logic Eastern India Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 chal...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Recovery Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. The Court held that the plaintiff, who purchased property from co-owners, cannot recover possession without establishing his title and the defendants' possession as trespassers, and the concurrent findings of fact by lower courts cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.

7 Jan 2025

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of possession and damages against the respondents/defendants 2 and 3 in respect of a property that w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Port Trust's Claim for Demurrage Prior to Confiscation Order: Suit Not Barred by Limitation. Right to Sue Accrues on Date of Confiscation Under Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963, and Not at Expiry of Free Days Despite Board's Powers Under Sections 61 and 62 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

15 Dec 2006

This is a suit filed by the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay against an importer for recovery of port trust charges (wharfage and demurrage) ac...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Reforms Tribunal Order in Land Grant Case — Petitioners' Father Was Granted Land Under Rule 43(5) of Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969, and the Land Was Not Granted Under the Land Reforms Act. The Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

7 Jan 2020

The petitioners, legal representatives of late D. Ramanatha Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Single Judge Order on Maintainability of Private Complaints Against Public Servants Under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Single Judge Had Ruled That the Karnataka Lokayukta Act Does Not Expressly Exclude the Operation of Alternative Measures and There Is No Repugnancy With the Code of Criminal Procedure.

29 Nov 2013

The case originated from private complaints filed by the respondent, Sirajin Basha, against the appellant, B.S. Yeddyurappa, a former Chief Minister o...

91 92 93 94 95

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)