Search Results for "false FIR"

3009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Medical evidence failed to corroborate alleged assault with axe and stick under Sections 326 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 6.1.2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Purna, in Regular Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

The case pertains to an appeal by the original accused (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) against their conviction under Sections 498-A and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator.

The applicant, Mangal Credit and Fincorp Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an application under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Alleged Offences Under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Occurred Outside India, Not Triable in Indian Courts Without Sanction.

The petitioners, Arpan Amarish Parikh, his sister Amisha Chirag Desai, and his parents Mira and Amarish Parikh, filed a criminal writ petition under A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of POCSO and IPC Proceedings on Compromise Between Accused and Complainant Who Later Married. Marriage Between Accused and Complainant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC as Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

The applicants, Taj @ Arjun S/o. Ajay Mishra (accused) and Ragini Ashok Amarnani (complainant), jointly filed a criminal application under Section 482...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Public View. Alleged Caste-Based Insult Occurred Inside Private House, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellants, Pravin Machindra Neel and Vishal Machindra Neel, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Vague Allegations. Lack of Specific Overt Acts Against Mother-in-Law and Sister-in-Law Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioners, being the mother-in-law (petitioner no.2) and sister-in-law (petitioner no.3) of the respondent no.2 (complainant), sought quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Soma @ Somanna, was convicted by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Devanahalli, Bangalore Rural District, in S.C. No. 136/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 136 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kenchanna, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Spl. C. No.285/2008 for an offence punishable under Section 136...