Search Results for "application returned"

4573 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4573 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt.

The petitioner, T.C. Chandraiah, was the accused in Criminal Case No.433/2013 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna, for an offence unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Date of Birth Dispute — Employee Failed to Prove Error in Service Record. Labour Court's Order to Correct Date of Birth Set Aside as Employee's Claim Was Unsubstantiated and Made at the Fag End of Service.

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, a cooperative sugar factory, challenged the judgments of the Labour Court and Indus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Orders in Tenancy Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Tenant's Default in Rent Payment for Three Years Warrants Eviction Under Section 25(2) of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The dispute concerned agricultural lands bearing Survey Nos. 24/2A and 24/2B, originally leased by the landlord’s predecessor to the tenant’s pred...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...