Search Results for "Valid notice"

9112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Arbitration Dispute Over Termination of Concession Agreement — Upholds Arbitral Award Restored by Earlier Judgment. Court Holds That Curative Jurisdiction Under Article 142 Is Not Available to Re-Argue Merits Where No Miscarriage of Justice Is Shown.

The Supreme Court dismissed a curative petition filed by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) against its earlier judgment in Delhi Airport Metro Expre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Draft Assessment Order in Faceless Assessment Scheme for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Petitioner's Objections Not Considered and No Personal Hearing Granted Despite Request Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Piramal Enterprises Limited, a registered company engaged in pharmaceutical manufacturing and trading, filed its original return of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.

The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015

The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Ad-Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit for 'Orient' Electric Appliances. Plaintiff's Longstanding Use and Registration of 'Orient' Mark Found Sufficient for Interim Protection Against Defendants' Identical Mark.

The plaintiff, Orient Paper & Industries Limited, filed a suit before the Bombay High Court alleging trade mark infringement and passing off against d...