Search Results for "Central Government Authority"

7395 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7395 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Freedom Fighter Pension for Alleged Participation in Quit India Movement. Petitioners failed to provide contemporaneous documentary evidence of participation in freedom struggle as required under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 14 individuals seeking freedom fighter pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.9189 of 2010

The matter arose out of a dispute over the setting up of a new private sugar factory. Khandoba Prasanna Sakhar Karkhana Limited and Sahyadri Sahakari ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012

The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointments Under RTI Act, 2005 — No Merit Found in Allegations of Irregularities in Selection of Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners.

The petitioners, Janhit Manch and others, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the appointments of the Chief ...