Search Results for "1964 Rules"

1715 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1715 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5290 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2207 OF 2005

The petitioner, a Hindi Trained Graduate Teacher with Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS), was appointed at Bangalore in 1989 and made permanent in 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Repealed Penalty Rule Cannot Apply: The Supreme Court Upholds Application of Amended Rule in Excise Penalty Case

The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd, holding that penalties for exceeding permissible limits of liquor wastage du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sale of Granted Land on Grounds of Delay and Laches. Petitioner Failed to Challenge Sale Deed Executed in 1972 for Over 30 Years, Despite Knowledge.

The petitioner, Smt. Guthemma Kom Fakira Chalvadi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Appointment as Civil Judge Due to Disqualification Under Rule 5(2) of Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977 — Marriage to a Married Man with Living Spouse Renders Candidate Ineligible for Judicial Service.

The petitioner, Smt. Radharani Mahadev Kolambe, an advocate, applied for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) pursuant to a notification dated 1s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules in Favor of Teacher in Disciplinary Case. Court Quashes Illegal Punishment Imposed by School Management.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, quashed the penalty imposed by the school management on the petitioner, a permanent teacher,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in CRPF Seniority Dispute — Direct Recruits Rank Senior to Promotees. Date of Allotment to Units Constitutes Date of Appointment Under Rule 8(e) of CRPF Rules, 1955.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by direct recruit Sub Inspectors (General Duty) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Union of India ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Seniority List in High Court Staff Service. Court upholds the principle that seniority is determined by the date of continuous officiation in a cadre, not by the date of initial appointment or confirmation.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by employees of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the seniority list of Assistant...