Search Results for "land water dispute"

1617 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1617 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Partially Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 50 per sq.m. Based on Comparable Sale Deed. Reference Court's enhancement from Rs. 25 to Rs. 100 per sq.m. set aside as excessive; claimants' claim for Rs. 500 per sq.m. rejected.

The judgment concerns two cross-appeals arising from the acquisition of land for the Mardol National Highway 4A (Mardol Bye-pass) in Ponda Taluka, Goa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Illegal Electricity Demand by Government of Goa. Demand of Rs. 48,50,360/- for Electricity Charges from Successor Company Set Aside as Without Authority of Law Under Electricity Act, 1910 and Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The appellants, Shri Ambey Forging Pvt. Ltd. and its director Pawan Lila, filed an appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31/03/2007 of the Ad h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case Concerning Termination of Temporary Workers. Termination Held Not Retrenchment, Falling Under Section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act as Employment Was Under Fixed-Term Contracts.

The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Industrial Court's order dated 23.12.1999 which confirmed the Labour Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Dnyanoba Baburao Pandhare and Lilawatibai Pandhare, were convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 323, 324 read with 34 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeals of Occupants Challenging Eviction from Comunidade Land — Appellants Failed to Prove Title or Authorisation, Eviction Upheld Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC and Section 38 Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves five first appeals filed by Ayub Khan, Khurshida Ahmad, Salim Sandhi, Mehmood A. Ansari, and Dadapir Lohar against the State of Goa,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...