WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2025
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "first come first serve"
2302 result(s) found
Found 2302 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeals in Section 138 NI Act Cases — Reverses Acquittal by Sessions Court. Presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies once signature on cheque is admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of legally enforceable debt.
26 Sep 2025The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Pierre Antonio Lobo (the complainant) against the acquittal of Jose Remedios A.A. Rodrigues (the accus...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Original Tenant to Recover Possession from Subsequent Tenant Inducted During Pendency of Execution Proceedings - Doctrine of Lis Pendens Applies to Post-Decree Proceedings Under Order XXI CPC. The court held that a person inducted during the pendency of an application under Order XXI Rule 97 or 99 CPC is a lis pendens inductee and cannot resist the original tenant's claim for possession.
28 Jun 2019The case involves a dispute between two tenants over possession of a property. The landlord, Mohammed Usman Shaikh Umar, filed a suit for eviction aga...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Service on Detenue in Judicial Custody and Reliance on Irrelevant Material. The court held that failure to serve detention order promptly and reliance on a case where detenue was not involved vitiates the subjective satisfaction under the MPDA Act.
1 Oct 2025The petitioner, Dikshant @ Dadu Devidas Sapkale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon u...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty - Failure to Prove Mental Cruelty by Wife's Refusal to Cook or Stay Out of House. The court held that such behaviour falls within the ordinary wear and tear of married life and does not constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
29 Aug 2006The appellant husband and respondent wife were married on 26th February 1993 at Murtizapur. According to the appellant, after 3 to 5 months of normal ...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Impleadment of Parties in Property Dispute — Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Trial Allowed as No Prejudice Caused. Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits liberal amendment before trial; impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC allowed for complete adjudication.
1 Aug 2014The plaintiffs, Sharayu Ramkrishna Mhatre and Anjali Deepak Karnik, filed a suit (Suit No. 1964 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaratio...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Rape FIR in Breach of Promise to Marry Case — Consensual Relationship Not Rape. Sexual intercourse based on a promise to marry does not constitute rape under Section 375 IPC if the promise is broken due to circumstances beyond control, and family members cannot be vicariously liable for rape under Section 376 IPC.
20 Jan 2016The petitioners, including Bharat Devdan Salvi (Petitioner No.1) and his family members (Petitioners No.2 to 7), filed a Criminal Writ Petition under ...
- 156
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Rape FIR in Breach of Promise to Marry Case — No Offence of Rape Made Out as Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual Based on Promise of Marriage. Court holds that failure to marry due to incompatibility does not constitute rape under Section 375 IPC or cheating under Section 417 IPC.
20 Jan 2016The petitioners, including the main accused Bharat Devdan Salvi and his family members, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution re...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows De-reservation of Plot Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Within Time. The court held that the reservation on the petitioner's plot lapsed due to the respondents' failure to acquire the plot within the prescribed period after service of purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.
22 Mar 2017The petitioner, Ashok Shriram Kulkarni, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking de-reservation of a plot bearing CTS 339 1/A – A/...
- 216
