Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty - Failure to Prove Mental Cruelty by Wife's Refusal to Cook or Stay Out of House. The court held that such behaviour falls within the ordinary wear and tear of married life and does not constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant husband and respondent wife were married on 26th February 1993 at Murtizapur. According to the appellant, after 3 to 5 months of normal stay, the respondent started raising quarrels with him and his mother. She refused to attend to day-to-day activities such as cooking and serving food. Consequently, they were allotted a separate room in the house, but the respondent used to remain out of the house for the whole day. The appellant filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on the ground of cruelty. The trial court dismissed the petition. The first appellate court confirmed the dismissal. The appellant then filed a second appeal before the High Court. The High Court framed a substantial question of law: whether the wife's refusal to cook and serve food and her habit of remaining out of the house for the whole day constitute cruelty. The court noted that the appellant failed to prove that the wife's conduct caused reasonable apprehension in his mind that it would be harmful or injurious to live with her. The court held that such behaviour falls within the ordinary wear and tear of married life and does not amount to cruelty. The appeal was dismissed, and the judgment of the lower courts was confirmed.

Headnote

A) Hindu Marriage Act - Divorce - Cruelty - Section 13(1)(i-a) - Burden of Proof - The husband alleged that the wife refused to cook and serve food and remained out of the house for the whole day, causing mental cruelty. The court held that such behaviour does not amount to cruelty as it falls within the ordinary wear and tear of married life. The husband failed to prove that the wife's conduct caused reasonable apprehension in his mind that it would be harmful or injurious to live with her. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the wife's refusal to cook and serve food and her habit of remaining out of the house for the whole day constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Judgment of lower courts confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Divorce
  • Cruelty
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Section 13(1)(i-a)
  • Burden of Proof
  • Mental Cruelty
  • Ordinary Wear and Tear of Married Life
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (08) 138

Second Appeal No. 249 of 2001

2006-08-29

A.H. Joshi, J.

Mr. J.J. Chandurkar for the Appellant, Mr. Abhay Sambre for the Respondent

Nitin Bhaurao Tidke

Smt. Sujata wife of Nitin Tidke

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against dismissal of divorce petition on ground of cruelty

Remedy Sought

Appellant husband sought divorce from respondent wife on ground of cruelty

Filing Reason

Alleged that wife refused to cook and serve food and remained out of house for whole day, causing mental cruelty

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed divorce petition; first appellate court confirmed dismissal

Issues

Whether the wife's refusal to cook and serve food and her habit of remaining out of the house for the whole day constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that wife's behaviour of refusing to cook and serve food and remaining out of house for whole day amounted to mental cruelty. Respondent denied allegations and submitted that behaviour was not cruel.

Ratio Decidendi

The behaviour of a spouse refusing to cook and serve food or remaining out of the house for the whole day does not amount to cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as it falls within the ordinary wear and tear of married life. The burden is on the petitioner to prove that the conduct caused reasonable apprehension of harm or injury.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has failed to prove that the behaviour of the respondent was such as to cause a reasonable apprehension in the mind of the appellant that it would be harmful or injurious for him to live with the respondent. The behaviour of the wife in not cooking and serving food and remaining out of the house for the whole day, in the facts of this case, does not amount to cruelty.

Procedural History

Appellant filed divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which was dismissed by trial court. First appeal to District Court was also dismissed. Appellant then filed second appeal before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(1)(i-a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Encroachment Removal Notice as Re-litigation. Petitioner failed to establish legal right over public street; court directed eviction within four weeks under Section 128 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local B...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty - Failure to Prove Mental Cruelty by Wife's Refusal to Cook or Stay Out of House. The court held that such behaviour falls within the ordinary wear and tear of married life...