Search Results for "dependency compensation"

1031 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1031 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case Under UP Urban Buildings Act, 1972. Prescribed Authority's finding of bona fide need and comparative hardship under Section 21(1)(a) reinstated as Appellate Authority's reversal lacked sufficient reasoning.

The appeal arose from a landlord-tenant dispute over a cinema building in Allahabad. The appellant, successor-in-interest to Murlidhar Aggarwal, sough...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Multiplier and Negligence Contentions Rejected. Deceased biker crushed under tanker wheel; court affirms tribunal's finding of sole negligence on tanker driver and upholds multiplier of 17 based on deceased's age of 32.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of Sanjay Patil, who died at age 32 when his motorcycle was crushed und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased driver found 50% negligent for driving on wrong side, reducing insurer's liability proportionately under Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

The case arises from a motor accident on 3 October 1986 near Shirdi Temple on Lasalgaon Road. The deceased, Admar Poojary, was driving a Fiat Car bear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Future Prospects and Consortium. Deceased's income reassessed with 25% future prospects and Rs. 70,000 per claimant for loss of consortium under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the legal heirs of deceased Ganesh Tayade, who died in a motor accident on 16 November 2006 when a truck owned by respondent n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act — Reduces Future Prospects and Non-Pecuniary Damages. The structured formula under the Second Schedule does not permit future prospects or excessive non-pecuniary damages.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the legal representatives of the dec...