Search Results for "compromise order"

1704 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1704 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation on Encroachments on Public Utility Land in Nagpur. Petition Treated as PIL and Notice Issued to Authorities for Removal of Encroachments on Reserved Lands.

The matter involves a public interest litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by social workers Madhukar Sampatr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Both Convicts' and State's Appeals in Rioting and Murder Case — Conviction and Acquittal Affirmed. Court Reappreciates Evidence, Finds Inconsistencies Insufficient to Upset Trial Court's Findings.

The appeals arose from an incident on 8 August 1985 in village Hivare, Koregaon, District Satara, where two factions clashed following a dispute over ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses First Appeal Against Limitation Dismissal of Temple Rights Suit. Court Holds Section 10 of Limitation Act Inapplicable as Suit Seeks Declaration and Injunction, Not Possession of Trust Property.

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a first appeal preferred by the original plaintiffs against the dismissal of their trust suit by the Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sale of New Tenure Land by Adivasi Requires Government Permission; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant, Shantaben Gopalbhai Tadvi, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Vacate Injunction. Court holds that a tenant cannot be dispossessed without due process of law and that the trial court's order refusing to vacate ad-interim injunction was not perverse.

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 24th June 2004 passed by the learned trial Judge on Applications at Exh.5 and Exh.36 in Special Civil...