Search Results for "Statutory purchase"

2846 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2846 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Circular Denying Export Incentives to Purchasers from 100% EOU. Clarification That Exports Through EOUs Are Ineligible Under VKGUY Scheme Is Valid and Not Contrary to Foreign Trade Policy.

The case involves appeals by M/s. Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills and others against the Union of India and others, challenging a circular dated 21st Jan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MSME Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on admission of liability and failure to object to jurisdiction before Facilitation Council.

The petitioner, Nexus Infratech, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Certificate Against Guarantor in Cooperative Bank Loan Fraud Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Documents and Pass Reasoned Order Renders Recovery Proceedings Invalid Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Tarulata Amritlal Bava, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a Recovery Certificate dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure of Consideration. Complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as share transfer was not completed under MOU.

The case involves two appeals filed by Harendra Ramchandra Pathak (complainant) against the acquittal of Dharmendra Ratan Mhatre and Rajendra Ratan Mh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings of Fact in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Petitioner failed to establish tenancy rights as adopted son of deceased tenant due to lack of credible evidence and introduction of new pleas at belated stage.

The petitioner, Premanand Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders of the Appellate Authority...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Port Trust for Refusing Remission of Demurrage Charges. Port Trust's Own Guidelines for Remission When Detention by Customs for Bonafide Operations Must Be Followed.

The petitioner, M/s. Rasiklal Kantilal & Co., a partnership firm engaged in import of goods including zinc ingots and copper wire bars, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Enhanced to Rs.66 per Square Metre for Konkan Railway Project. Comparable Sale Deeds of Nearby Land at Rs.64 and Rs.66 per Square Metre Form Basis for Valuation Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case arises from the acquisition of 23,900 square metres of land belonging to the appellant, Smt. Shrimati Vishwanath Acharya (since deceased, rep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Public Trust Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Commissioner Failed to Consider Objections Properly After Remand.

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Paradsinga, challenged the acquisition of their land for the benefit of Respondent No. 3, a public tru...