Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Objections to Maintainability and Limitation in Suit for Recovery of Trust Property. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Suit for Recovery of Shares by Public Charitable Trusts Not Barred by Limitation.

The case concerned a notice of motion taken out by two public charitable trusts, the J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Shree Krishna Foundation, against Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitrator’s Interim Order in Film Remake Rights Case. Dispute Involves Enforcement of Agreement Dated 24 January 2012 Granting Remake Rights of Film 'Zanjeer' and Payment of Instalments.

The petition was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim order dated 16 July 2012 passed by the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appropriate Authority's Purchase Order Under Section 269UD(1) Income Tax Act for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Supply Valuation Report and Sale Instances to Transferor and Transferee Before Passing Compulsory Purchase Order Invalidated Proceedings.

The writ petition challenged an order dated 28 April 1993 passed by the Appropriate Authority under Section 269UD(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by School Management Against Reinstatement of Probationary Teacher. Termination of probationer without inquiry and without approval under Section 5 of MEPS Act is invalid.

The case involves an appeal by a school management (Shri Vinayak Vidhyadayini Trust and its Headmistress) against the order of the School Tribunal and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Dispute Due to Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The award was based on no evidence and misreading of the agreement, ignoring letters that modified the restriction on telecast rights.

The petitioner, Radha Krshna Films Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 05/01/2007 passed by the Joint Tribunal of the Film Makers Combine (FMC) a...