Search Results for "Majority rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Majority rule"

2471 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2471 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suit Involving Share Buyback Under Letter of Undertaking. The appeal challenges the grant of interim injunction on grounds that the agreement is not a concluded contract and that its performance would breach MIMPS Regulations making it void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

11 Sep 2015

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arises from an order dated 13 October 2014 passed by a single judge granting interim inj...

High Court

Madras High Court Restrains State from Granting Permanent Public Employment to Kin of Stampede Victims; Permits Temporary Appointments Subject to Judicial Review. The Court Holds That Compassionate Appointments Must Adhere to Constitutional Provisions Under Articles 14 and 16 and Cannot Be a Colourable Exercise of Power.

27 Jul 2026

The writ petitions, filed as Public Interest Litigations under Article 226 of the Constitution, sought to restrain the State Government from granting ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Interim Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Prima Facie Finds Interim Award Passed Without Considering Entire Pleadings and Grants Stay of Enforcement.

7 Aug 2019

The matter involved two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim award dated...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.

10 Jun 2010

This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...

High Court

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, adjudicates writ petition challenging selective acceptance of resignations of Agricultural Produce Market Committee members under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The court examines legality of co-option of two members and subsequent notification, while respondents contend the petition became infructuous after acceptance of remaining resignations.

9 Sep 2025

This writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, arose out of a dispute concerning the Agricultural Produce Market Comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint Based on Unregistered Lease and Determination of Lease. Court Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Specific Performance and Monetary Claims Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

4 Mar 2014

The case involved a suit for specific performance and a money decree filed by Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd (plaintiff) against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Labelling Activity Does Not Amount to Manufacture Under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Additional labelling on already marketable goods without enhancing marketability does not constitute manufacture, and extended period of limitation is applicable due to suppression of facts.

30 Apr 2024

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against an order of CESTAT which allowed the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Resettlement Act — Acquisition Upheld as Possession Vested in Government and Section 48(1) Application Rejected. Court Held That Once Possession Is Taken and Award Is Passed, Government Cannot Withdraw Land From Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Ashok Shantinath Chougule, as legal heir of his deceased father Shantinath Dada Chougule, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

10 May 2023

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Wakf Property Dispute Due to Res Judicata Bar from Prior Representative Suit and Compromise Decree. The Court Held That a Judgment in a Representative Suit Under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Binds All Interested Parties Under Explanation IV to Section 11, and a Compromise Decree Precludes Re-agitation of Title Issues, Affirming Lower Court Decisions.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute centered on a property claimed as wakf by the Jamia Masjid Gubbi, represented by its President, against defendants including successors of...

90 91 92 93 94

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)