SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
Search Results for "Government Consideration"
16434 result(s) found
Found 16434 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Exemption for Bonded Warehouse Sales Under Section 5(2) of Central Sales Tax Act. Legal Issue Concerned Whether Transfer of Documents Before Filing Bill of Entry for Home Consumption Constitutes Sale in Course of Import Before Crossing Customs Frontiers.
8 Feb 2019The matter concerned two sales tax references made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arisin...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Custodial Death Case. Court holds that investigation by CB-CID is independent and fair, and no ground for transfer to CBI is made out.
6 Mar 2019The petitioner, Ramprasad Gupta, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking transfer of investigation into the custodial deat...
- 123
High Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under 2013 Act. Compensation Must Be Determined as per Market Value Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Without Applying Theory of Dediction from Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as per Section 26 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
27 Mar 2025The dispute arose from the acquisition of land for widening and four-laning of National Highway No.12-A in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, under The Right t...
- 319
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Reference to Larger Bench in Pension Dispute of U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Employees. Preetam Singh Judgment Held Binding on State and Board Regarding Pension Scheme Implementation.
10 Feb 2020The Supreme Court heard a batch of special leave petitions arising from writ petitions filed by employees of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parisha...
- 180
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.
19 Apr 2024The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Validity of Rule 5 of Goa Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2002 — Declares Quarry Lease Valid Despite Deletion of Chapter III. Rule 5, which deleted Chapter III of the Goa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1985, is held intra vires Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, as the State Government has power to make rules for grant of quarry leases in respect of land belonging to private persons.
10 Dec 2013The petitioner, Smt. Maria Teresa Philomena D'Rocha Pegado, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the constitutional v...
- 89
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.
14 Aug 2018The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal and Upholds Striking Down of State Government’s Power to Extend Section 144 Orders Beyond Two Months. Extension of Magisterial Orders by Executive Fiat Without Judicial Review Held Violative of Article 19(1)(b),(c),(d) and Not Saved by Reasonable Restrictions.
29 Oct 1969The dispute involved a constitutional challenge to the second part of section 144(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, which permitted the Stat...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The court held that a delay of 21 days in deciding the detenu's representation without satisfactory explanation renders the detention illegal.
17 Feb 2015The petitioner, mother of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Acti...
- 85
