High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Company Appeal (L) No. 47 of 2012 Along with Connected Appeals and Applications. No substantive judgment text was provided; only the cause list and appearances were available.
6 Nov 2012...
Search Results for "substantially same issues"
1778 result(s) found
Found 1778 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Revokes Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Suit for Recovery of Loan Facilities — Defendant No. 5's Application Allowed as No Cause of Action Arose Within Jurisdiction. Territorial Jurisdiction Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act, 1866 Requires Cause of Action to Arise Within Court's Limits; Mere Registered Office of Plaintiff Insufficient.
4 Feb 2013The Plaintiff, Future Corporate Resources Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court for recovery of short-term loan facilities advanced to Defendant...
- 215
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Mutation Dispute Based on Registered Sale Deed — U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Registered sale deed dated 04.06.1957 held valid without formal proof under Section 57 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and consolidation authorities' findings on title set aside.
1 Jan 2026The dispute originated from a registered sale deed dated 04.06.1957, through which the predecessors of the appellants purchased agricultural land meas...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Police Officers in Custodial Torture Case Due to Absence of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts of Procuring Confession by Assault During Investigation Held to Be Done in Purported Discharge of Official Duty, Requiring Prior Sanction Under Section 197 of Cr.P.C., 1973.
9 Jul 2026Background: The case involves criminal writ petitions filed by three police officers (a Police Inspector and two Police Constables) challenging the or...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Consent Terms Not Binding on Applicants Under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. Court holds that applicants who were not parties to consent terms are entitled to restoration of possession or alternative accommodation.
8 Apr 2005The case involves an appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against an order of a learned single Judge in a Chamber Summons taken out by Responde...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Civil Procedure Matter — Section 9A CPC Repealed. Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction Cannot Be Decided Under Repealed Provision; Trial Court Directed to Decide Jurisdiction Along with Other Issues.
7 Apr 2006The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Madhuri Prabhakar Patole against Aruna Satishchandra Gaikwad, challenging an order of the Civi...
- 84
High Court
Karnataka High Court Reserves Decision on Quashing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Dispute; Developers Contend Breach of Contract, Not Cheating. Court Examines Whether Civil Dispute Can Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
21 Oct 2024The Karnataka High Court heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of mult...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Auction Purchaser Not Liable to Pay Unearned Increase to DDA in Compulsory Acquisition Case. Conversion Charges Refunded as Property Conveyed Was Freehold, Not Leasehold.
12 Feb 2019The Supreme Court of India heard two cross-appeals arising from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 30.03.2016 in LPA No.226 of 2014. The dispute...
- 263
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes IBBI Circular as Ultra Vires in Insolvency Professional Regulation — Circular Purporting to Clarify Regulation 4(2)(b) of LP Regulations Held to Be an Impermissible Retrospective Amendment.
4 Apr 2024The petitioner, Amit Gupta, a chartered accountant and registered insolvency professional, challenged a circular dated 28 September 2023 issued by the...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Strikes Down LIC Circular Imposing Assignment Charge on Finance Organizations as Ultra Vires Section 38 of Insurance Act, 1938. The court held that LIC cannot impose a charge on assignments of life insurance policies in favor of finance companies as it amounts to a restriction on the statutory right of assignment under Section 38.
19 May 2010The petitioners, Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. (a Non-Banking Finance Company) and its director Hasmukh Rawal, challenged a Circular dated 24.4.2006 issued...
- 96
