Search Results for "mandatory meeting date"

1674 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1674 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Plea to Quash PC-PNDT Act Proceedings for Non-compliance of Form-F Requirements. Medical Centre Operators Allegedly Failed to Obtain Patient Signatures on Mandatory Forms, Prompting Inspection and Criminal Complaint.

Two doctors, who operated a diagnostic centre, faced criminal proceedings under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Women Army Officers' Right to Permanent Commission in Landmark Gender Equality Judgment. Court holds that women SSC officers are entitled to PC at par with male counterparts, rejecting discriminatory service conditions.

The case concerns a batch of appeals filed by the Ministry of Defence against a Delhi High Court judgment directing the grant of Permanent Commission ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Liquidated Damages and Interest Reduced. Court upholds arbitrator's finding on delay but modifies interest rate from 7% to 6% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (petitioner) against a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sealed Cover Procedure in Promotion — No Vested Right to Promotion Exists. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to promotion as sealed cover procedure was validly applied due to pending vigilance inquiry.

The Petitioner, Pramod Kumar, an employee of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. in Scale IV, appeared for a departmental promotional examination for Scale V ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Demolition Notice Case. Court holds that demolition notices under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 require prior show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing, upholding trial court's order setting aside notices.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (appellant) filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which set aside demolition n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established as Owner of Acquired Lands. Petitioner claiming tenancy cannot challenge acquisition without established title.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company's Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Title Not Established. Company failed to prove ownership of acquired lands, hence no locus standi to challenge awards under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...