KAHC010074912022_1
27 May 2022...
Search Results for "government tender"
1961 result(s) found
Found 1961 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes SRA Acquisition Notice for Church Land, Upholds Owner's Preferential Right to Redevelop Slum. The Court held that the owner of slum land has a preferential right to redevelop the land under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority cannot acquire the land for a private developer without considering the owner's proposal.
11 Jun 2024The petitioner, a public trust managing Mount Mary's Church in Bandra, Mumbai, owned land admeasuring 9371.30 sq. meters, out of which 1596.40 sq. met...
- 511
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Urban Improvement Trust's Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Delay and Compensation Disputes. Notification under Section 52(1) of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 Valid; Compensation Determined and Paid Lawfully.
10 Dec 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Urban Improvement Trust against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had quashed the land...
- 588
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds State Government's Notification Fixing Minimum Wages for Hotels and Eating Houses Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Validity of Alternative Procedure Under Section 5(1) Upheld as Not Arbitrary.
29 Sep 1969The case arose from a challenge by hotel owners to the notification issued by the Government of Mysore under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, fixing minim...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.
5 Aug 2016This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.
5 Aug 2016The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs State of Goa to Notify SOTTO and Implement Organ Transplant Rules Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. The court held that failure to notify SOTTO and create transparent waiting lists violates the Act and Rules, affecting the right to health of patients.
7 Aug 2019The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by The Mango Foundation (TMF), a registered non-profit organization,...
- 179
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs State of Goa to Notify SOTTO and Implement Organ Transplant Rules Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. Court Orders Creation of Transparent Waiting Lists, Retrieval Teams, and Dedicated Website for Organ Transplantation in Public Interest.
7 Aug 2019This Public Interest Litigation was filed by The Mango Foundation, a registered non-profit organization, seeking enforcement of the Transplantation of...
- 169
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Constitution of Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs for Violation of Section 14 of Wakf Act, 1995 — Notification Nominating Member of Parliament Quashed. The court held that the State Government must strictly comply with Section 14 of the Wakf Act, 1995, while constituting the Wakf Board, and the nomination of a Member of Parliament as a member was invalid.
18 Jun 2010The petitioners, ten Dawoodi Bohras, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitution of the...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.
11 May 2012The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...
- 85
