Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was of the essence in the agreement for sale dated 25.04.2007, and the plaintiff did not demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 25.04.2007 between the plaintiff (appellant) and the defendant (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition to Recall Complainant for Cross-Examination in Cheque Dishonour Case. Magistrate's Rejection of Section 311 CrPC Application Set Aside as Failure to Exercise Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Shankar s/o Nathuji Khandare, was the original accused in S.C.C. No. 5305/2009 filed by respondent no.2, APT Packaging Limited, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Involving Perfume Brands. Court restrains defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks and artistic logos, finding prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiffs, Ahmed Perfumes LLC and M/s. Ahmed Al Maghribi Perfumes Trading LLC, both UAE-based companies in the perfume business, filed a Commerci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession. Court holds that mere possession of property documents does not establish ownership and that plaintiffs must prove their title independently.

The plaintiffs, claiming to be owners and in possession of a plot of land in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Documents in Civil Suit — Defendant's Right to Produce Evidence Upheld. Trial Court's Order Rejecting Documents as Inadmissible Without Proper Application of Mind Set Aside; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration Under Order 13 Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioner, M/s. Mahesh & Associates, a registered partnership firm, was the defendant in O.S. No.6141/2015 pending before the LVIII Additional Ci...