Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Involving Perfume Brands. Court restrains defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks and artistic logos, finding prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiffs, Ahmed Perfumes LLC and M/s. Ahmed Al Maghribi Perfumes Trading LLC, both UAE-based companies in the perfume business, filed a Commercial IP Suit seeking permanent injunction against the defendants for infringement of copyright in their artistic logos and trademark infringement/passing off. The plaintiffs claimed to be the owners of well-known marks including 'AHMED AL MAGHRIBI' and various logos used on their perfume products, which are registered under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. They alleged that the defendants, including Mohammed Faisal Rehman Sultan Ahmed trading as FRS India, Al Ahmed India (a partnership firm), Ahmed Al Maghribi LLP, and Salma Mohammed Faisal Shamsi, were using deceptively similar marks such as 'AHMED AL MAGHRIBI', 'Al Ahmed', 'BIN SHAIKH', 'OUD & ROSES', 'KAAF', and 'MARJ', as well as the corporate name 'Ahmed Al Maghribi LLP' and domain name 'www.ahmedindia.com', which were identical or confusingly similar to the plaintiffs' marks. The plaintiffs sought interim relief pending trial. The court, after hearing arguments, found that the plaintiffs had made out a prima facie case of copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and passing off. The balance of convenience was in favor of the plaintiffs, and irreparable loss would be caused if the injunction was not granted. Consequently, the court allowed the interim application and restrained the defendants from using the impugned marks, corporate name, and domain name until further orders.

Headnote

A) Intellectual Property - Copyright Infringement - Artistic Work - Section 51, Copyright Act, 1957 - Plaintiffs claimed copyright in logos used on perfume products - Court held that reproduction of substantial part of artistic work without license constitutes infringement - Prima facie case established (Paras 1-10).

B) Intellectual Property - Trademark Infringement - Deceptive Similarity - Section 29, Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Plaintiffs' marks 'AHMED AL MAGHRIBI' and logos were registered - Defendants' marks found deceptively similar - Likelihood of confusion and damage to plaintiffs' goodwill - Injunction granted (Paras 11-20).

C) Intellectual Property - Passing Off - Corporate Name and Domain Name - Defendants adopted corporate name 'Ahmed Al Maghribi LLP' and domain name 'www.ahmedindia.com' - Held that such adoption amounts to passing off as it misrepresents connection with plaintiffs - Balance of convenience in favor of plaintiffs (Paras 21-30).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to an interim injunction restraining the defendants from infringing their copyright in artistic logos and from using deceptively similar trademarks and corporate name, pending disposal of the suit.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Interim Application No. 1405 of 2026 is allowed. Defendants are restrained from infringing plaintiffs' copyright in artistic logos and from using the impugned marks, corporate name 'Ahmed Al Maghribi LLP', and domain name 'www.ahmedindia.com' until further orders.

Law Points

  • Copyright in artistic work
  • trademark infringement
  • passing off
  • interim injunction
  • prima facie case
  • balance of convenience
  • irreparable loss
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (05) 44

Interim Application No. 1405 of 2026 in Commercial IP Suit No. 711 of 2025

2026-05-07

Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Hiren Kamod a/w. Mr. Pratik Pansare a/w Mr. Anshul Saurastri a/w. Ms. Preeta Panthaki and Mr. Atif Sayyed i/b. Krishna & Saurastri Associates LLP, Advocate for the Plaintiff/Applicant. Ms. Shagufta Ansari a/w. Mr. Khwaja Shaikh, Advocate for the Defendant/Respondent.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial IP suit seeking permanent injunction for copyright and trademark infringement and passing off.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs seek interim injunction restraining defendants from infringing copyright in artistic logos and using deceptively similar trademarks, corporate name, and domain name.

Filing Reason

Defendants allegedly using marks and logos identical/deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks and copyrighted artistic works, causing confusion and damage to plaintiffs' goodwill.

Issues

Whether the plaintiffs have a prima facie case for copyright infringement in their artistic logos. Whether the defendants' marks are deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' registered trademarks, constituting infringement and passing off. Whether the balance of convenience lies in favor of granting interim injunction.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiffs argued that they are the owners of well-known marks and copyright in logos, and defendants' adoption of similar marks is dishonest and causes confusion. Defendants likely argued against the grant of injunction, but specific arguments not extracted from text.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case of copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and passing off. The balance of convenience was in favor of the plaintiffs, and irreparable loss would be caused if the injunction was not granted. Therefore, interim injunction was granted.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present Interim Application, the Plaintiff seeks injunctive reliefs against the Defendants restraining them from infringing the Plaintiff’s copyright in the artistic work comprised in the Plaintiff’s logos... The court found that the plaintiffs had made out a prima facie case of copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and passing off.

Procedural History

The plaintiffs filed Commercial IP Suit No. 711 of 2025 seeking permanent injunction. The present Interim Application No. 1405 of 2026 was filed for interim relief. The application was reserved on April 6, 2026, and pronounced on May 7, 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Copyright Act, 1957: 51
  • Trade Marks Act, 1999: 29
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Involving Perfume Brands. Court restrains defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks and artistic logos, finding prima ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Income Proof and Negligence Apportionment. Claimants failed to establish deceased's income and contributory negligence was not conside...