High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Equity Jurisdiction"
2788 result(s) found
Found 2788 result(s)
High Court
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Deputy Registrars Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Due to Mistaken Pay Rule Interpretation. Court holds that recovery of excess payments made without employee fault violates Article 300A of the Constitution and principles of equity.
10 Mar 2023The petitioners, eight former and current Deputy Registrars of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Registrar ...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash DV Complaint Against In-Laws in Broken Engagement Case — Domestic Violence Act Applies to Women in Domestic Relationships Including Engagements. The court held that an engagement creates a relationship in the nature of marriage under Section 2(f) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and in-laws can be respondents under Section 2(q).
10 Jun 2022The petitioners, Aditya Anand Varma, his parents Anand Prakash Varma and Aarti Anand Varma, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Probate Petition for Will Executed by NRI in Ecuador. Will executed abroad by Non-Resident Indian held valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, and probate granted to executor in Mumbai.
16 Oct 2025The petitioner, Sarwan Kumar Jhabarmal Choudhary, filed a testamentary petition (L) No. 6300 of 2024 in the Bombay High Court seeking probate of the L...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Batch of Writ Appeals Filed Under Karnataka High Court Act Against Single Judge Order in BDA Matter. The Court’s decision and specific legal findings are not provided in the extracted text.
26 Feb 2021The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, constituted by Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda, heard a batch of writ appeals on 26th ...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.
21 Nov 2025The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.
22 Mar 2022The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...
- 133
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Co-operative Society's Challenge to Reinstatement of Workmen Fails for Lack of Jurisdictional Error. The court upheld the Labour Court's award directing reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% back wages, finding no perversity or error of law warranting interference under Article 226.
7 Feb 2023The petitioner, Indian Coffee Workers' Co-operative Society Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...
- 286
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Matter — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Examine Validity of Sale Notice Where Fraud or Irregularity Alleged. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act does not oust civil court jurisdiction when the challenge is based on fraud or violation of statutory provisions.
12 Aug 2022The appellants, plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging ...
- 99
