KAHC010142892018_1
8 Dec 2025These cross-appeals arose from the Judgment and Award dated 19.01.2018 in MVC No. 758/2015 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mysuru. The ...
Search Results for "tribunal’s findings"
4806 result(s) found
Found 4806 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased Driver's Income Exceeds Threshold Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claim Under Section 163A Not Maintainable as Deceased's Annual Income Exceeded Rs.40,000/- Limit Prescribed Under Second Schedule.
21 Jul 2022The appellants, legal heirs of deceased Kailas Vithal Nanaware, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the M...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee's Order Invalidating Caste Claim. Court upholds that the Scrutiny Committee's finding of invalidity of caste claim based on documentary evidence and vigilance report is final and binding unless perverse.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Sandeep Sambhaji Yadav, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, which invalidated his...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Head Master's Petition Against Reduction in Rank Without Enquiry. Management's Order of Reduction in Rank Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.
13 Mar 2015The petitioner, Raghunath Bapu Nangare, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher at Bhadole High School on 31 May 1993, effective from 1 June 1993, and h...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Finding of Perversity in Enquiry Officer's Findings. Court upholds that perversity of findings is a jurisdictional fact and Labour Court's conclusion was based on evidence.
18 Jun 2026The Petitioner-Bank challenged the order of the Labour Court dated 1 September 2023 in Complaint (ULP) No.58 of 2014, which held that the enquiry agai...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employer to Prove Charges Before Labour Court Despite No Prior Enquiry — Right to Lead Evidence Not Lost by Delay in Filing Application. Employer's Application to Lead Evidence to Justify Removal of Employee Without Domestic Enquiry Was Wrongly Rejected by Labour Court; Supreme Court Precedent Permits Leading Evidence Even if No Enquiry Held.
12 Mar 2024The petitioner, Ekvira Nagri Pat-Sanstha Maryadit, an employer, challenged an order dated 07/09/2022 passed by the Labour Court, Amravati, rejecting i...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to CAT Order Quashing Dismissal of Naval Employee for Non-Service of Charge Sheet. Failure to Serve Charge Sheet at Correct Address Violates Natural Justice, Disciplinary Proceedings Vitiated.
21 Apr 2022The case involves a challenge by the Union of India and naval authorities against a judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, whi...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal of Injured Passenger in Railway Accident Claim Case Due to Bona Fide Passenger Status and Untenable Defence of Self-Injury. The Court held that the Railway Claims Tribunal erred in rejecting the claim on the ground that the appellant voluntarily alighted from the train, as the statement to GRP was not conclusive and the appellant was a bona fide passenger.
4 Oct 2022The appellant, Laxman Ganesh Kanhojia, was a bona fide passenger travelling on 14.02.2018 by Train No. 11040 Up Maharashtra Express from Bhandara to N...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Compensation Award for Traumatic Amputation. The Tribunal's assessment of 70% disability and award of Rs.5,02,600 under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was upheld as just and proper.
19 Mar 2019The case involves an appeal by the insurance company against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, granting compensation to the clai...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.
14 Jun 2019The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...
- 172
