Search Results for "special limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "special limitation"

3651 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3651 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of Continuing Guarantee Against State Government — Limitation Bar Rejected as Guarantee Subsists Until Full Payment. Continuing Guarantee Clause 6 of Deed Dated 5th June 1982 Remains Operative Until All Moneys Paid, Hence Claim Not Barred by Limitation.

1 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Co-op. Bank Ltd., stood as guarantor for a loan advanced to Swami Vivekanand Kaku Tel Sahakari Karkhana Limited. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

8 Jan 2013

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Property Dispute Over Succession Certificate — Held That Succession Certificate Is Not Necessary for Claiming Title by Adverse Possession or Will. The court clarified that a succession certificate under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is not a prerequisite for filing a suit for declaration of title based on a Will or adverse possession, and that the Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide such matters.

14 Nov 2025

The case involves two cross civil revision applications arising from a property dispute between Maharukh Mediomah Patel (applicant in CRA/64/2021) and...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Ex Parte Decree in Recovery Suit. Trial Court's Discretionary Order to Allow Defendant to File Written Statement on Payment of Costs Upheld Under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC.

7 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Sujitnath Banerjee, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,32,62,249/- against the respondents. The defendants were served but failed t...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of 718-Day Delay in Filing Appeal by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Reference Cases. Delay Condoned Subject to Costs of Rs. 15,000 per Application Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

16 Jan 2026

The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, presided over by Honourable Mrs. Justice M. K. Thakker, delivered a common oral judgment on 16/01/2026 in a ba...

High Court

High Court Quashes Order in Section 34 Arbitration Application Due to Lack of Notice to Claimants. Failure to Issue Notice to Opposite Party Before Passing Order Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

14 Sep 2023

The petitioners, legal representatives of late Shivarama Gujjal, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Against Municipal Council — Limitation for Suit by Tenant Against Landlord Not Applicable to Suit for Injunction Against Municipal Council. The suit for permanent injunction against municipal council for interference with possession is governed by Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963, and limitation begins when right to sue accrues, not from date of alleged encroachment.

17 Nov 2023

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arises from a suit for permanent injunction filed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Domestic Violence Case — Restores Maintenance and Compensation. The court held that the appellate court's order setting aside maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was perverse and not sustainable.

15 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Pushpa, filed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDV Act) before the JMFC II at Belgaum,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness and Suit Barred by Limitation. Agreement of Sale Dated 12.1.2000 Fixed Three Months for Execution; Suit Filed in 2003 Beyond Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2015

The appellant, V.P. Venkatesh, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,...

88 89 90 91 92

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)