Search Results for "revenue officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "revenue officer"

6163 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6163 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Tax Recovery, Holds Notification Empowering Tahsildar as Tax Recovery Officer Cannot Have Retrospective Effect; Attachments Invalid. Executive Notification under Section 2(44) of Income-tax Act, 1961 Cannot Operate Retrospectively to Validate Pre-issuance Acts, as Delegated Legislation Lacks Retrospective Force Absent Express Statutory Authorization.

28 Jul 1969

The dispute arose out of recovery proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, M.C. Ponnoose, had income-tax arrears, and his shares were...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Income Tax Appeal Filed by Assessee Company Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court’s Judgment Reserved on 12 June 2025 and Pronounced on 20 June 2025.

20 Jun 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Bogus Purchase Case — GP Rate Restricted to 15% on Alleged Bogus Purchases. The court held that when purchases are accepted as genuine but from bogus parties, only the profit element embedded in such purchases can be taxed, not the entire purchase amount.

13 Oct 2025

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Rectification Deed Held Invalid for Reducing Consideration Without Commercial Substance. The Court restored the addition of Rs. 10,69,79,146/- made by the Assessing Officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the rectification deed was a colourable device to evade tax.

22 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which dismissed its appeal and confirmed the order of the Inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Pre-deposit of 25% Amount Not Mandatory for Filing Appeal Under Section 247 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The court held that the first proviso to Section 256(2) of the MLRC requiring pre-deposit applies only to appeals under Section 256, not to appeals under Section 247.

31 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Avinash Madhukar Kharat and Dhanaji Rajaram Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 27 April...

High Court

Validation of DRI Officers' Jurisdiction. Establishing the authority of DRI officers as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

26 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Idea Cellular Ltd., challenging the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, 3i Infotech Limited, challenged a notice dated 18 March 2009 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax seeking to reopen the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Marhatta Chamber of Commerce Held Eligible for Section 11 Exemption Despite Business Income. Trust's incidental business activity does not forfeit exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

11 Jan 2019

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against IGST Demand of Rs.1524 Crores on Arbitration Award Damages. Issue Pertains to Whether Damages Paid Under Deemed Decree Constitute Consideration for Taxable Service Under IGST Act, 2017.

30 Apr 2026

The dispute centers on a writ petition filed by Tata Sons Private Limited (Tata) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging an intima...

88 89 90 91 92

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)