Search Results for "muddemal"

926 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 926 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024

The case stems from Crime No. 634 of 2022 registered at Kalamna Police Station for multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC), attempted mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Armed Robbery Case under IPC Section 392 Read with 397. Court Finds Accused No.1 Guilty Based on Spot Arrest and Recovery of Weapons While Accused Nos. 2 and 3 Identified by Witnesses Confirm Involvement in Robbery.

On 10 September 2002, two individuals posing as customers entered 'Lovely Collection' garments shop in Shivaji Park, Mumbai, and at gunpoint and with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) of IPC. Appellant Contends That Evidence Only Proves Attempt to Rape, Not Penetration, Challenging Conviction for Rape of a Minor Below 12 Years.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant for the rape of a ten-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code. On Novembe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Assistant Teacher Under Sections 376, 354, and 366 IPC. Appeal Challenges Trial Court's Findings on Alleged Rape and Outraging Modesty of a Minor Student.

The appellant, a mathematics teacher at Yashoyash School, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 366 read with 34, 376, and 354 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Accused's Appeal in Murder Case — Conviction Challenged Due to Lack of Direct Evidence. Trial Court Relied on Circumstantial Evidence Including Witness Testimony and Recovery of Blood-Stained Hammer.

The present matter pertains to a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against the conviction of the appellant for the murder of one Rajendra I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Abetment of Suicide and Cruelty, and Dismisses State Appeal for Enhancement. Evidence of Harassment by Husband, Letter from Deceased, and Medical Inconsistencies Establish Guilt Under Sections 498A and 306 IPC Despite Hostile Child Witness.

Sunil, the accused, married Ratnamala on 23 March 1998. Within a short span, Ratnamala complained to her parents and relatives about her husband’s i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Lack of Compelling Necessity for Detaining Person Already in Custody. Detaining Authority Failed to Provide Cogent Material Showing Likelihood of Detenu's Release on Bail, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

Background: The case involves a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a preventive detention order passed against the petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.307 OF 1994

The case involved three criminal appeals filed by convicted accused (original accused nos.1 to 4, 7 and 8) against the judgment and order dated 28/4/1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Key Issue Raised is Whether Prosecution Proved Exclusive and Conscious Possession of Charas by the Accused.

The High Court of Bombay heard two criminal appeals against convictions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The prosecutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction and Life Imprisonment for Triple Murder Under Sections 302 and 499 IPC. Accused Challenges Reliability of Eye-Witnesses in Dark Night, Non-Examination of Independent Witnesses, and Lack of Ballistic Expert Report.

Background: The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 16.5.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.93/2...