Search Results for "mandatory FIR"

1109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Misapplication of Section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Charge Framed Under Wrong Provision Invalidates Conviction

The appellant, a Junior Clerk in a Sessions Court, was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 52A and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband identity and sampling procedure.

The appellant, Mangilal, was convicted under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Procedural Non-Compliance in Private Vehicle Search. Conviction Quashed as Search Governed by Section 42, Not Section 43, of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, with Mandatory Requirements Not Met.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the appellants were found with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Convict in Gangrape Case on Ground of Juvenility — Inquiry Report Shows Appellant Was Below 18 Years at Time of Offence. Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 Benefit Extended as High Court Failed to Conduct Mandatory Age Determination Inquiry Under Section 7A and Rule 12.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Raju, who was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gangrape and sentenced to 10 year...