Search Results for "government service removal"

1797 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1797 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Order in Bank Loan Recovery Dispute. Limitation Period for Filing Execution Application Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Is 12 Years, Not 3 Years.

The appeal arises from an order dated 3 November 2004 of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the Appellant's Writ Petition No.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses TANGEDCO Appeal in Dismissed Employee Leave Encashment Case. Leave Encashment is Not a Pensionary Benefit Under Rule 21 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of TANGEDCO against a single judge order dated 26.08.2022 in W.P. No. 4503...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Appeal Against Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Appointing Trustees to Vishwa Punarnirman Sangha Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Question of Maintainability of Appeal Against Administrative Directions Under Section 41‑A Referred to Division Bench

The appeal arose from an order dated 19 May 2016 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Mumbai, in Application No. 74/2015 under Sections 47 and 41...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Re-grant of Inam Land Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Petitioners Failed to Prove Title Over Inferior Watan Inam Land Re-granted to Successor-in-Interest of Original Inamdar.

The case involves a challenge to an order passed by the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Udgir, under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Increase in BHMS Admission Capacity. AYUSH Ministry's decision to reject increase from 50 to 100 seats upheld as per Section 21A of the Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973.

The petitioners, Disha Shikshan Vikas Kendra and E.B. Gadkari Homeopathy Medical College and Hospital, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Dilapidated Building, Directs LIC to Reconstruct with Tenant Accommodation. The court held that the building was unsafe and required demolition, but LIC must provide alternative accommodation to tenants during reconstruction.

The judgment concerns a writ petition filed by tenants of the General Assurance Building in Mumbai, challenging a notice issued under Section 354 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Granted by Sub-Divisional Officer Instead of Collector Held Incompetent, Despite Satisfactory Evidence of Demand and Acceptance.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Satara, appealed against the acquittal of Ramdas Bhagwan Vairat, a Talathi (village reve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Jurisdictional Challenge to Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Equity Share Issuance. Whether Alleged Shortfall in Premium Constitutes Income from International Transaction Under Chapter X of Income Tax Act, 1961.

Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd. (the Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, required funds for its telecommunicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxation of Alleged Shortfall in Share Premium Under Transfer Pricing Provisions. The Dispute Centers on Whether Chapter X of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Can Apply When No Actual Income Arises from the International Transaction.

The petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, issued 2,89,224 equity shares at a pre...