Search Results for "doubtful recovery"

1286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Double Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of mother and brother set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Shivram Krishnan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, for the murder of his mother and brother under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Cab Driver Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC.

The case involves four appellants convicted for the murder of a cab driver during a robbery. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial eviden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307 and 452 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijay Jaywant Dongare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Khed-Rajgurunagar, Pune, for offences under Sections 307 (attempt to murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Land Dispute Case. Court confirms life imprisonment for appellant under Section 302 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.50 of 2016. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a relative with enmity and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Khushal @ Anant Chindu Bhunde, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Subhash Somaji Bandal. The pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Hostile Complainant and Lack of Evidence. State fails to prove charges under Sections 364-A, 386, 387 IPC as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and identification of accused was doubtful.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16/12/1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Injured Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole testimony of PW-2 was inconsistent with medical evidence and prosecution failed to prove motive.

The appellant, Milind Hanumant Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati for the murder of a 10-year-old boy, Prathamesh, and f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as testimony of child witness was inconsistent with medical evidence and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Tukaram Rau Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of Yashodabai, and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 365 IPC set aside as sole identification by witnesses was doubtful and no independent corroboration of recovery of child.

The appellant, Aditya Sham Chaturvedi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, under Sections 363 and 365 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Illicit Relationship. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for killing deceased due to illicit relationship with his wife; conviction based on motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Surendra Sribali Sahu, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Pramod Amrit Ram. The prosecution case was that the appell...