Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1999 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1999 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions in Cheating Case — Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld. Court finds concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence and no grounds for interference under revisional jurisdiction.

The case involves three criminal revision petitions filed by the petitioners against their conviction under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in Cheating Case — Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld. Concurrent findings of fact regarding dishonest inducement and delivery of property in land sale transaction not interfered with.

The case involves three criminal revision petitions filed by the accused persons against their conviction under Section 420 read with Section 34 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession over suit land.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the original suit, filed O.S.No. 88/1995 before the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Bidar, seeking a declaration of title...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding joint family property and limitation cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Madhusudan Vishwanath Mule, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge Junior Division at Malkapur dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. Court upholds concurrent findings of courts below that appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) over a piece of land in Po...