Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Arbitral Award in Slum Redevelopment Agreement Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Setting Aside of Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Sep 2019...
Search Results for "written undertaking"
2226 result(s) found
Found 2226 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.
29 Jul 2005The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.
28 Nov 2011The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Prosecution and Non-Payment of Court Fees in Copyright Dispute Over Film Script. Plaintiff failed to pay deficit court fee of Rs.2,50,000 and did not prosecute the suit after interim relief was denied.
27 Jan 2016The plaintiff, Uday Singh Deshraj Rajput, filed Suit (L) No. 967 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court on 11 November 2013 seeking a declaration that he wa...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Suit for Specific Performance Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Refusal to Execute Sale Deed in 2018.
4 Sep 2025The appellants, Sri K.T. Govinde Gowda and Smt. G. Anuradha, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challe...
- 64
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Recall of Tender for Mine Operator Under Section 14 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999. Court Examines Whether Lowest Bidder Has Vested Right and Whether Conviction of Ex-Directors Justifies Cancellation.
16 Mar 2023The Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (the Corporation) issued a notice inviting tender on 02.12.2020 for the selection of a Mine Operator for the d...
- 38
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Interpretation of Lease Deed in State of Bihar v. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. — Interest on Arrears of Rent Calculated on Lump Sum Basis, Not Per Annum, Under Clause (xii) of Lease Deed. The Court held that the absence of the words 'per annum' in Clause (xii) of the Lease Deed was deliberate and the demand for interest on a yearly basis was illegal.
9 May 2019The case involves a dispute between the State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) and Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. regarding the calculation of interest on arrears...
- 206
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines
8 Apr 2026The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Passes Judgment on Interim Application and Contempt Petition Arising from Alleged Violation of Injunction in Trademark Suit. Petitioners Allege Wilful Disobedience of Order Restraining Use of 'Khadi' Mark and Association Name.
7 Aug 2026The dispute concerned an application under Order XXXIX, Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and a contempt petition arising from alleged wilf...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Possession of the Acquired Land Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a writ petition filed by Fakhruddin s/o Hyderali (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Mustafa Fakhruddin Ambawala) challen...
- 75
