Search Results for "transferable development rights"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "transferable development rights"

168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Specific Performance of Development Agreement — Failure to Consider Limitation and Lack of Evidence of Agreement. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge succeeds as award based on letter dated November 4, 2003 read with unregistered document suffers from patent illegality and perversity.

12 Dec 2025

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award dated August 5, 2017, which had granted specific performance of a development agreement in favor of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.

9 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Despite Pending Civil Suit — Statutory Right to Conveyance Independent of Contractual Disputes. The Competent Authority's grant of deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 was upheld as the statutory right operates independently of a pending civil suit for specific performance and damages.

7 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Swastik Promoters and Developers, challenged an order dated 26th July 2021 passed by the Competent Authority (District Deputy Registra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Orders Directing Issuance of TDR for Land Acquired for Road Widening — Compliance Found, Delay Apologized. The Court held that the respondents had substantially complied with the orders and the delay was not intentional, accepting unconditional apology.

13 Dec 2024

The judgment concerns multiple contempt petitions filed by landowners whose land was acquired for widening of Bellary and Jayamahal Roads in Bengaluru...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Land Allotment Policy for Cooperative Societies in Andhra Pradesh — Violation of Article 14 and Lack of Transparency. Preferential allotment of government land at basic rates to MPs, MLAs, Judges, AIS officers, and journalists held arbitrary and unconstitutional.

13 Dec 2024

The case involves cross appeals against a Division Bench judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 05.01.2010, which partly allowed writ petitio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

4 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Development Charges Demand on Nazul Land for TDR-Based Construction — No Legal Basis for Levy Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code or Nagpur Land Rules. The court held that the Nazul Tahsildar cannot demand development charges for NOC to sell flats constructed using TDR on nazul land as there is no statutory provision authorizing such levy.

1 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Thapar, owner of nazul Plot No.94 in Ramdaspeth, Nagpur, entered into a development agreement with M/s Raghav Life Spaces on 22 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Levy on TDR/FSI Transfers by Builders Association. Transferable Development Rights (TDR) and Floor Space Index (FSI) are 'goods' under Article 366(12) of the Constitution and subject to GST as a supply under Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

10 Apr 2018

The petitioners, Builders Association of Navi Mumbai and Neelsidhi Realties, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Representations of Forest Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act. Petitioners Sought Recognition of Forest Rights and Patta Under Sections 4(3), 4(5), 4(6) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

8 Feb 2016

The petitioners, twelve individuals claiming to be forest dwellers, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to the State...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)