Search Results for "successor body"

211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to High Court Exceeding Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC. High Court's Reappreciation of Evidence in Second Appeal Quashed as Beyond Scope of Substantial Question of Law.

The present appeal arises from a property dispute between the original plaintiff (respondent) and the original defendants (appellants) concerning the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that findings of fact recorded by courts below based on evidence cannot be disturbed in appeal under Section 96 CPC unless perverse or contrary to material on record.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed by the Senior Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Service of Notice. Service of Notice on Son Not Valid Service Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Smt. Sampada Vilas Mahargude, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talewadi, Taluka Atpadi, District Sangli. A motion of no confidence w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order Granting Tenancy Rights in Land Reforms Case — Tribunal Failed to Consider Evidence and Conduct Proper Inquiry Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioner, K.T. Venkatappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Co...