Search Results for "slum redevelopment"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand and Order in Writ Petition by Petitioner Against State of Maharashtra Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Due to Time-Barred Proceedings and Erroneous Computation

The Petitioner, challenged Demand Notices and an Order by the Collector of Stamps and CCRA under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, alleging a deficit i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Stay of Demand for Slum Rehabilitation Authority in Income Tax Exemption Case — Prima Facie Case Established for Section 11 Exemption Despite Section 2(15) Proviso. Statutory Authority's Non-Profit Slum Rehabilitation Activities Held Charitable, Not Commercial.

The Petitioner, Slum Rehabilitation Authority, a statutory body established under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Demolition Order in Slum Area — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Slum Act Procedure. Notice under Section 351 of MMC Act set aside as premises fell within declared slum area requiring compliance with Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The appellant, Shri Ramawatar Babulal Jajodia, filed an appeal against an order dated 14.10.2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Borivali Division, Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Slum Dwellers Against Eviction for Redevelopment. Non-members of cooperative society lack locus to challenge Slum Rehabilitation Authority's eviction order.

The case involves an appeal filed by four individuals (Ramesh Fakira Lohkare, Arun Baban Kadam, Ramesh Rama Dhakrao, and Suryakant Janardhan Sonawane)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Slum Property Dispute — City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction. Court holds that suit for declaration and injunction regarding slum premises is not barred by Section 28 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, as the bar applies only to eviction suits.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications challenging an order dated 23/07/2012 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Greater M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Saleable FSI and Possession of Property. Court restrains respondents from alienating saleable FSI and disturbing possession pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Atul Resorts and Hospitality India Pvt. Ltd. and Atul Projects India Ltd., filed two arbitration petitions under Section 9 of the Arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Project — Petitioner's Right to Hearing Not Violated as Adjournment Sought on Ground of Illness Not Supported by Medical Certificate.

The petitioner, Madhukar Shankar Parsekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Slum Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Cause. Petitioner did not respond to show cause notice under Section 33 of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, making writ petition premature.

The petitioner, Ashok Mahadeo Palvankar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a notice dated 2.12.2004 issued under Section 33 o...