Search Results for "revision under Mamlatdar’s Court Act"

247 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Dismissing Land Revenue Appeal as Not Maintainable. Mutation Dispute Under Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 - Second Appeal Held Maintainable Despite Absence of Specific Provision.

The petitioners, four individuals, challenged the order of the Land Revenue Tribunal dated 19/1/2022, which dismissed their Land Revenue Appeal No.48/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Execution Orders — Decree Holder Entitled to Possession Despite Alleged Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Execution Court Cannot Go Behind Decree; Objections Under Section 47 CPC Not Maintainable.

The applicants (judgment-debtors) filed a civil revision application challenging two orders dated 31/07/2018 and 30/10/2018 passed by the Senior Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sub-Divisional Officer's Revision Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906. Sub-Divisional Officer Not Authorized to Exercise Revisional Powers Under Section 23(2) of the Act.

The petitioner, Bija Maroti Hatwar, filed an application under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906, seeking to restrain respondent no.1 from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Mundkar Status Determination — Flour Mill Not Part of Dwelling House Under Goa Mundkar Act. Concurrent findings of fact by Deputy Collector and Administrative Tribunal upheld as not perverse.

The petitioner, Shri Naguesh V. Bodke, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Deputy Collector dated 15.12.2005 and the Administrative Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition Challenging Remand Order by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy Dispute. Finality Clause under Section 73 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Does Not Bar Revision Jurisdiction of Tribunal When Possession Issue Remains Unresolved.

The petitioners, landlords, were aggrieved by an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 31 July 1991 in Revision Application No. MRT.P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...