Search Results for "reference court award"

5879 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5879 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act and Confirms Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute; Appeal Under Section 37 Arises. Single Judge's Order Upholds Award Holding Breach of Contract by Not Supplying DTC Lists

The appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)/Maharashtra State El...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 28-A Application for Enhanced Compensation Based on High Court's Appellate Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land owners covered by same notification can seek parity under Section 28-A even if reference court refused enhancement.

The petitioners, legal heirs of original land owners Shankarrao Pandoji Shendge and Bhagwan Pandoji Shendge, owned agricultural land in Mouza Ansing, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals on Land Acquisition Compensation for Minor Irrigation Tank. Reference Court's Enhanced Market Value Challenged by Both State and Land Losers.

The High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench heard a conglomeration of appeals filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986

The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...